Every backtest on this site is a simulation. This page is not. These are real accounts on a public exchange, with real money, and the exchange publishes what happened to each of them.
Hyperliquid publishes a leaderboard of accounts with their profit over four windows. We take every account that has actually traded and count how many are down.
The denominator matters more than the numbers do. An account that did not trade today has a profit of exactly zero today — counting it as "not losing" pushes the daily loss rate down to 12.5%. We only count accounts that actually traded in each window.
| Window | Accounts that traded | Down | If idle accounts were counted | Median return | Worst 5% | Best 5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | 7,898 | 41.8% | 12.5% | 0.0% | -25% | 26% |
| This week | 14,126 | 40.4% | 14.9% | 0.0% | -59% | 50% |
| This month | 19,128 | 36.5% | 16.6% | 5.0% | -81% | 90% |
| All time | 43,743 | 50.4% | 50.4% | -1.0% | -100% | 1313% |
43,743 accounts have traded. The profit is not spread among them.
| Top | Share of all profit |
|---|---|
| 1accounts | 2.6% |
| 10accounts | 9.8% |
| 100accounts | 32.1% |
| 1,000accounts | 68.6% |
Thirteen textbook strategies, three markets, six timeframes. Only one — buying a fixed amount on a schedule — beat simply holding in all three markets. Outside crypto, trend-following collapsed entirely.
| Snapshot taken | 2026-09-26T09:22Z |
| Source | Hyperliquid public leaderboard (stats-data.hyperliquid.xyz/Mainnet/leaderboard) |