STEADYTRADE
Strategy backtests · past-window simulation, not investment advice
BTC/USDTETH/USDTGold (PAXG)

MACD Cross · Gold (PAXG)

Enter when the histogram turns positive, exit when it turns negative.

Total return
34.3%
10,000 → 13,431
vs buy & hold
-84.3%
over the same period 118.6%
Max drawdown
26.3%
10,000 → 8,522
Longest underwater
1059
1059 days · 95% of the period
Settings that beat it
0 / 16
of 16 parameter settings tested
Win rate
42%
95% CI 32%–53% · n=79
This lost to simply buying and holding.

Over 2020-09-01 → 2026-09-23 it returned 34.3% while buying once on the first day and never touching it returned 118.6% — 84.3% worse. Not one of the 16 parameter settings tested beat the benchmark. The median setting returned 32.1%.

It spent 1059 days below its previous high at the longest stretch — 95% of the whole period under water.

The win rate on this page is not a readable number. With 79 closed trades the 95% confidence interval runs 32%–53% — it spans a coin flip, so the headline 42% cannot be distinguished from chance at this sample size. It is shown because leaving it out would be worse, not because it supports a conclusion.

Price & fills

Equity

account equitybuy & holddashed = starting capital

159 fills. Signals are taken on the close and filled at the next open.

A 0% risk of ruin here is a property of the test, not a safety rating. These runs are long-only spot with no borrowed money, so there is no margin call and nothing can force the position closed. The account cannot be wiped out — it gets stuck holding the asset instead. Capital deployed (1×) and max drawdown (26.3%) are the numbers that carry the risk on this page. The same rules run on margin would be a different measurement, and this figure would not stay at zero.

Outcome distribution

A single return is one chosen start date. These are 62 runs of the same rules with the start shifted forward 30 days at a time.

Worstp10p25Medianp75p90BestLosing starts
-10.8%-0.5%2.8% 8.9%12.7% 17.2%25.7%15%

Does it survive outside its best case?

The numbers above are one market on one timeframe. A rule that only works there did not work — the market did.

Timeframe

Same rules, same parameters, different candle size on Gold (PAXG).

TimeframeTradesReturnBuy & holdvs B&HBeat itTrades
4H 13281 -74% 119% -192% no515
1D ← 2214 34% 119% -84% no79
1W 316 63% 123% -60% no8

Market — 2 of 3

Same rules, same parameters, different asset — daily candles.

MarketReturnBuy & holdvs B&HBeat it
BTC/USDT 822% 530% +292% yes
ETH/USDT 535% 276% +259% yes
Gold (PAXG) 34% 119% -84% no

Does it survive its own parameters?

The headline above uses one parameter setting. Here is every setting tested: 16 combinations, median 32.1%, best 58.6%, worst 24.6%. 0 of them beat buy & hold.

A strategy that only works at one setting did not work — it was fitted.

Parameter grid

MACD Cross run across its own parameter range over the full period. The same rules flip from profit to loss depending only on the numbers you picked — which is why a single headline return is meaningless on its own.

fast 8fast 12fast 16fast 20
slow 2133%44%32%32%
slow 2631%34%31%27%
slow 3437%29%31%41%
slow 5031%25%49%59%

Hover a cell for trade count and drawdown. “·” = invalid combination (fast ≥ slow).

Year by year

Year202120222023202420252026
Return2%-0%12%11%11%-8%
Max DD6%10%6%7%10%20%
Trades1011913148

Recent closed trades

ClosedP&L (USDT)Held
2026-08-29 +1144.85 38 bars
2026-07-17 -470.69 14 bars
2026-06-24 -310.56 1 bars
2026-06-21 -530.58 5 bars
2026-06-04 -261.61 4 bars
2026-05-16 -519.00 8 bars
2026-04-24 -51.39 23 bars
2026-03-05 +61.11 11 bars
2026-02-01 +955.24 22 bars
2025-12-30 +205.76 18 bars
2025-12-08 +181.24 13 bars
2025-11-21 -169.03 10 bars
2025-10-22 +781.71 22 bars
2025-09-29 -32.31 5 bars
2025-09-19 +950.43 26 bars
2025-08-13 -121.72 9 bars
2025-07-28 -46.14 16 bars
2025-06-20 -100.80 7 bars
2025-06-09 -237.44 6 bars
2025-06-01 -83.83 9 bars
2025-04-26 +141.34 14 bars
2025-04-05 -183.64 7 bars
2025-03-26 +64.92 12 bars
2025-02-16 +1027.70 51 bars
2024-12-19 -236.79 9 bars

What it is

Reference — Glowwiki: MACD
The definitions and formulas below follow that article. It states its own limit plainly:
“Whether this produces profit is not addressed in that article.”
That is the question this page answers.

Note from the reference: The reference article flags that "divergence" carries three different meanings in MACD writing — the two averages spreading apart, the MACD-minus-signal histogram, and price disagreeing with the indicator. It also records that MACD is a lagging indicator: by the time it shows a trend, the trend is largely over. The 12/26/9 defaults are convention from a daily-chart era, not a derived optimum.

Formulas

MACD line
MACD = EMA₁₂ − EMA₂₆
The 12/26 pair is the conventional default
Signal & histogram
Signal = EMA₉(MACD) ; Hist = MACD − Signal
This site enters when the histogram turns positive

Established

Conventional reading

Listed as convention, not as established fact.

Sources

  1. 기술적 분석 — Glowwiki (ko)
  2. Technical analysis — Wikipedia (en)

Assumptions

Period2020-09-01 → 2026-09-23
Parameters{"fast":12,"slow":26,"signal":9}
Fees0.10% taker + 0.05% slippage, both legs
Starting capital10,000 USDT · long-only spot, no leverage
Rolling test365 bars × 62 start dates
Input hashefe80ce3784933da

Other strategies · Gold (PAXG)

Buy & HoldMartingaleGridDCAMA CrossEMA CrossRSI ReversionMACD CrossBollinger ReversionDonchian BreakoutSupertrendStochastic CrossParabolic SAR