STEADYTRADE
Strategy backtests · past-window simulation, not investment advice
BTC/USDTETH/USDTGold (PAXG)

Martingale · Gold (PAXG)

Double down after every loss. Every closed trade is a winner by construction — that is what makes it dangerous.

Total return
12.3%
10,000 → 11,229
vs buy & hold
-106.3%
over the same period 118.6%
Max drawdown
3.5%
10,000 → 9,874
Longest underwater
155
155 days · 84% of the period
Settings that beat it
0 / 16
of 16 parameter settings tested
Win rate
100%
95% CI 96%–100% · n=94
This lost to simply buying and holding.

Over 2020-09-01 → 2026-09-23 it returned 12.3% while buying once on the first day and never touching it returned 118.6% — 106.3% worse. Not one of the 16 parameter settings tested beat the benchmark. The median setting returned 8.3%.

It spent 155 days below its previous high at the longest stretch — 84% of the whole period under water.

94 trades, a 100% win rate — and it still lost to doing nothing clever. A martingale only closes a cycle at a profit, so the win rate is 100% by construction. It tells you nothing about risk. What it actually cost: 31× the opening order tied up at the worst moment, and 118.5% left on the table versus simply buying a fixed amount on a schedule.

Price & fills

Equity

account equitybuy & holddashed = starting capital

227 fills. Signals are taken on the close and filled at the next open.

A 0% risk of ruin here is a property of the test, not a safety rating. These runs are long-only spot with no borrowed money, so there is no margin call and nothing can force the position closed. The account cannot be wiped out — it gets stuck holding the asset instead. Capital deployed (31×) and max drawdown (3.5%) are the numbers that carry the risk on this page. The same rules run on margin would be a different measurement, and this figure would not stay at zero.

Outcome distribution

A single return is one chosen start date. These are 62 runs of the same rules with the start shifted forward 30 days at a time.

Worstp10p25Medianp75p90BestLosing starts
-1.4%0.8%1.1% 1.4%1.9% 2.6%4.0%3%

Does it survive outside its best case?

The numbers above are one market on one timeframe. A rule that only works there did not work — the market did.

Timeframe

Same rules, same parameters, different candle size on Gold (PAXG).

TimeframeTradesReturnBuy & holdvs B&HBeat itTrades
4H 13281 15% 119% -104% no89
1D ← 2214 12% 119% -106% no94
1W 316 7% 123% -115% no65

Market — 0 of 3

Same rules, same parameters, different asset — daily candles.

MarketReturnBuy & holdvs B&HBeat it
BTC/USDT 87% 530% -443% no
ETH/USDT 110% 276% -166% no
Gold (PAXG) 12% 119% -106% no

Does it survive its own parameters?

The headline above uses one parameter setting. Here is every setting tested: 16 combinations, median 8.3%, best 18.9%, worst 3.8%. 0 of them beat buy & hold.

A strategy that only works at one setting did not work — it was fitted.

Parameter grid

Martingale run across its own parameter range over the full period. The same rules flip from profit to loss depending only on the numbers you picked — which is why a single headline return is meaningless on its own.

multiplier 1.5multiplier 2multiplier 2.5multiplier 3
dropPct 0.0317%10%15%19%
dropPct 0.058%12%14%19%
dropPct 0.086%7%8%10%
dropPct 0.124%4%4%5%

Hover a cell for trade count and drawdown. “·” = invalid combination (fast ≥ slow).

Year by year

Year202120222023202420252026
Return2%2%1%1%2%3%
Max DD2%4%0%0%0%1%
Trades9711162619

Recent closed trades

ClosedP&L (USDT)Held
2026-08-24 +5.70 step 1
2026-08-19 +5.70 step 1
2026-08-07 +17.09 step 2
2026-06-15 +85.45 step 4
2026-05-07 +17.09 step 2
2026-04-08 +5.70 step 1
2026-04-01 +85.45 step 4
2026-03-03 +17.09 step 2
2026-02-27 +5.70 step 1
2026-02-20 +5.70 step 1
2026-02-11 +5.70 step 1
2026-02-05 +17.09 step 2
2026-02-03 +17.09 step 2
2026-01-29 +17.09 step 2
2026-01-27 +5.70 step 1
2026-01-22 +5.70 step 1
2026-01-20 +5.70 step 1
2026-01-12 +5.70 step 1
2025-12-23 +5.70 step 1
2025-12-18 +5.70 step 1
2025-11-28 +5.70 step 1
2025-11-13 +5.70 step 1
2025-10-20 +5.70 step 1
2025-10-16 +5.70 step 1
2025-10-13 +5.70 step 1

What it is

Reference — Glowwiki: 마틴게일 (베팅 시스템)
The definitions and formulas below follow that article. It states its own limit plainly:
“실제 수익으로 이어지는지는 이 문서에서 다루지 않음.”
That is the question this page answers.

Note from the reference: The capital formula C = s₁(mᴺ−1)/(m−1) — and the 1,023× figure at m=2 over 10 steps — is arithmetic that follows from the definition, not a figure quoted by a source. The reference article marks it as such.

18th-century French casino betting system. Also known as Doubling system, averaging down.

Formulas

Stake at step n
sₙ = s₁ · mⁿ⁻¹
m = multiplier (classically 2)
Capital to survive N steps
C = s₁ · (mᴺ − 1) / (m − 1)
At m=2, 10 steps needs 1,023× the opening stake
Average entry after N adds
P̄ = Σ(sᵢ) / Σ(sᵢ / pᵢ)
Cost basis falls, but exposure grows geometrically
Expected value per cycle
E = p·w − (1−p)·l − fees
With a fair-coin edge of zero, fees make E strictly negative

Established

Conventional reading

Listed as convention, not as established fact.

Sources

  1. Martingale (betting system) — Wikipedia (en)
  2. Gambler's ruin — Wikipedia (en)
  3. 마틴게일 (베팅 시스템) — Glowwiki (ko)

Assumptions

Period2020-09-01 → 2026-09-23
Parameters{"basePct":0.02,"dropPct":0.05,"multiplier":2,"takeProfitPct":0.03,"maxSteps":10}
Fees0.10% taker + 0.05% slippage, both legs
Starting capital10,000 USDT · long-only spot, no leverage
Rolling test365 bars × 62 start dates
Input hashc53abb0489404900

Other strategies · Gold (PAXG)

Buy & HoldMartingaleGridDCAMA CrossEMA CrossRSI ReversionMACD CrossBollinger ReversionDonchian BreakoutSupertrendStochastic CrossParabolic SAR